260
16 Bioreactors for the Production of Industrial Chemicals and Bioenergy Recovery from Waste
9 Yentekakis, I.V. and Goula, G. (2017). Biogas management: advanced utiliza-
tion for production of renewable energy and added-value chemicals. Frontiers in
Environmental Science 5 (7) https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2017.00007.
10 Chawla, M., Rafiq, S., Jamil, F. et al. (2018). Hydrocarbons fuel upgradation in
the presence of modified bi-functional catalyst. Journal of Cleaner Production
198: 683–692.
11 Nikolaidis, P. and Poullikkas, A. (2017). A comparative overview of hydrogen
production processes. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 67: 597–611.
12 Boodhun, B.S.F., Mudhoo, A., Kumar, G. et al. (2017). Research perspectives on
constraints, prospects and opportunities in biohydrogen production. International
Journal of Hydrogen Energy 42 (45): 27471–27481.
13 Khan, M., Ngo, H., Guo, W. et al. (2016). Comparing the value of bioproducts
from different stages of anaerobic membrane bioreactors. Bioresource Technology
214: 816–825.
14 Bakonyi, P., Buitrón, G., Valdez-Vazquez, I. et al. (2017). A novel gas separation
integrated membrane bioreactor to evaluate the impact of selfgenerated biogas
recycling on continuous hydrogen fermentation. Applied Energy 190: 813–823.
15 Noblecourt, A., Christophe, G., Larroche, C. et al. (2017). High hydrogen produc-
tion rate in a submerged membrane anaerobic bioreactor. International Journal
of Hydrogen Energy 42 (39): 24656–24666.
16 Saleem, M., Lavagnolo, M.C., and Spagni, A. (2018). Biological hydrogen produc-
tion via dark fermentation by using a side-stream dynamic membrane bioreactor:
effect of substrate concentration. Chemical Engineering Journal 349: 719–727.
17 Shin, C. and Bae, J. (2018). Current status of the pilot-scale anaerobic membrane
bioreactor treatments of domestic wastewaters: a critical review. Bioresource
Technology 247: 1038–1046.
18 Aslam, M. and Kim, J. (2017). Investigating membrane fouling associated with
GAC fluidization on membrane with effluent from anaerobic fluidized bed biore-
actor in domestic wastewater treatment. Environmental Science and Pollution
Research International 26 (2): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9815-6.
19 Ahmad, R., Ahmad, Z., Khan, A.U. et al. (2016). Photocatalytic systems as an
advanced environmental remediation: recent developments, limitations and new
avenues for applications. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 4 (4):
4143–4164.
20 Aslam, M., Ahmad, R., and Kim, J. (2018). Recent developments in biofouling
control in membrane bioreactors for domestic wastewater treatment. Separation
and Purification Technology 206: 297–315.
21 Ahmad, R., Aslam, M., Park, E. et al. (2018). Submerged low-cost pyrophyl-
lite ceramic membrane filtration combined with GAC as fluidized particles for
industrial wastewater treatment. Chemosphere 206: 784–792.
22 Shahid, M.K., Pyo, M., and Choi, Y.G. (2018). The operation of reverse osmo-
sis system with CO2 as a scale inhibitor: a study on operational behaviour and
membrane morphology. Desalination 426: 11–20.
23 Sekoai, P.T., Yoro, K.O., Bodunrin, M.O. et al. (2018). Integrated system
approach to dark fermentative biohydrogen production for enhanced yield,